| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
   |
Posted - 2006.09.30 17:07:00 -
[1]
 Originally by: Darko1107
Dont give up ASCN! You can win it!
lol.. somehow I doubt ASCN will give up on the second day, at least give them some credit.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 18:41:00 -
[2]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 30/09/2006 18:41:11
... what I would really like to know is how many posts the alt, The Truth1, will be allowed to make before he gets banned... he was all over the pendulum thread yesterday and now he is infecting this one... 
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 19:28:00 -
[3]
.. it is only a matter of time before your posts get deleted Truth1 why don't you grow some balls and post with your main..
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 21:53:00 -
[4]
Originally by: Hast
forum ate my post and did weird stuff to it
..that'll teach ya...
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 21:59:00 -
[5]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 30/09/2006 22:02:46
Originally by: Havras
Tell me the thread Drakma tried to start, with good intentions, didn't get turned into a smackfest by BOB until Cyvok put his official stance up on the accusations.
The thread drakma started, whilst good intentioned, was always going to ring hollow until ASCN leadership actually went on record stating that they would not exploit game mechanics to gain an advantage.
That it took 24hrs of berrating, for Cyvok to actually make his final statement after a catalogue of forum blunders, was the surprising part.
There is a world of difference between being "smacked" about and creating a situation, whereby anybody with a brain cell can call you out on stuff you shouldn't be doing.
ASCN still need to find a PR consultant to keep them from putting their feet in their mouths.
[edit:typos]
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 22:08:00 -
[6]
... there you are again, putting your feet in your mouths..
on the pendulum thread, p12, post 354..
Cyvok managed to respond to the accusation put to him..
His response was clear... "nodes would be crashed if the server performance did not suit him"...(or words to that effect)
It then took another 10+ hours of berrating for him to make his final post clearing the mess up.
Its dealt with now, but pls don't make it look like the whole episode was anything but your own silly fault.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 22:23:00 -
[7]
Originally by: Chip2k3
No offence meant but is there a reason you KEEP posting?
.. yes there is.
I derive much amusement from pointing out inconsistencies in posts on these forums.. the greatest source of amusement is posts by leadership figures that are completely at odds with the image they try to portray.
Trial by forum... thats what these boards are about... you'd better get used to it.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 22:55:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Mauxir
What Nez is saying is that these boards have been without a village idiot long enough so he decided to volunter.
And if I may say so myself he is doing a *****ing job.
..I remember you, ex-SA .. MASS to be exact.
say hi to levin for me
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.09.30 23:30:00 -
[9]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 30/09/2006 23:31:09
Originally by: Durvaul
No he's right, this war doesnt concern u as mucha s it doesnt concern me but your so screaming for attention ur posting in every thread u possibly can to make urself known
Your a sad washout and you should stop
.. sharing a corp with Mr Happ/Lt Silver did your forum etiquette no favours whatsoever it seems ...
And this war concerns everybody who plays EVE today.... improvements in server performance may come about as a result... although it could be a complete disaster for the game, should CCP not enable fleet battles at all... add to that the political implications... and anybody who isnt paying attention needs their head examined.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.01 01:22:00 -
[10]
Originally by: Kcel Chim
i guess for the very same reasons the lag treaty nez tried to advertise didnt work.
.. interesting that you should mention that, it crossed my mind too. The problem here is that no agreements can be reached whilst the involved parties are more interested in winning (regardless of server performance) than in getting quality fleet battles....
there is nothing wrong with wanting to win (without resorting to exploits).. but with the current state of the servers, any large engagement over a certain amount of pilots (could be 50, could be 100) is probably going to end in a node crash... period.
So.... basically what we are left with is a battle of stamina to see, which side has the most patience and determination to wade through the quagmire of abysmal server performance.
For those, intereseted in perhaps re-assessing their thoughts on a lag treaty/convention, you will find the link to the thread here:
State of warfare in EVE: a posssible solution
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.01 01:35:00 -
[11]
Originally by: Goberth Ludwig
*when* the node crash... all drop
all ships killed after server crash are reimbursed
Now would you explain to me how avoiding the relog cease fire would help any of the two factions to "win" over the other?
I'm sorry you are going to have to try again, what you posted doesnt make much sense, I mean that with the fullest respect, I am very much interested in where you are going with this.
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.01 01:52:00 -
[12]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 01/10/2006 01:54:23
Originally by: Goberth Ludwig
what i am saying is - facts:
1 - node crash = everyone drops
2 - ccp reimburse all ships lost after node crashes
What reason to not respect a short (10 mins?) cease fire just to let everyone log back in? Why rushing to the gates to kill people logging on if they will get their stuff back anyway? The only result is overworking ccp queues.
Even if a faction wanted to win at all costs, I dont see how the relog cease fire would make any difference. 
k... now I understand... looking at your suggestion from an impartial point of view (I know you might think I am anything but, however, it is not the case ..).... Why should BoB agree to such a thing?
It is quite clear that they think they are going to win this war, whatever happens. Sir Molle's OP on this thread is testament to that.
So, it is reasonable to assume that in their mind allowing for a short cease fire, after node crashes, will only benefit ASCN, as BoB would get nothing out of it. Besides, they have what seems to be a wealth of experience in very laggy environments, something which going by the ASCN posts on this thread, you lack.
Tbh the way BoB are, the only thing that may appeal to them is a blanket limit on fleet sizes across the board, which would both reduce lag and reduce the chance of nodes crashing, thus enabling more fun engagements, which is what they live and breathe for.
Otherwise, you are both stuck with the server as it is.... and only the most patient and determined will be the victor, if there is one at all.
[edit:typo]
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.01 02:10:00 -
[13]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 01/10/2006 02:10:50
Originally by: Goberth Ludwig
nez: because after people log back and all are in same system then a fight can be attempted - its easy to rpeach about only looking for "good fights" and then racking up kills on people logging back on gates after node crash. Mind, they didnt lag out, the whole node died.
.. BoB are however atm better than you at dealing with the node crashes/lag, they have obviously encountered this before or at least planned for it, whereas you have not... so its not in their interest to make it easier for you. Its common sense.
Originally by: Goberth Ludwig
On a side note, I am not saying the k/d ratio would look much better if the engagements actually took place, but its funny how bob was all up for the "relog cease fire" with us in k-9 last week when we had them blobbed and the node crashed, and now all of a sudden arent interested in fair play anymore... respect 
.. perhaps the answer to this is that, now you are in an all out war situation, no holds barred, whereas last week it may have been a bit of fun pew pew.
Allowing you to get your act together after after a node drop, doesnt factor in when they know that you will be dropping huge fleets on them as the war progresses.
... again im only deducing the obvious here.
[edit:typo]
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.01 18:50:00 -
[14]
Originally by: Snodgey2004
So without reading the 10pages where are we upto ?
mmm.. roundabout here:
* BoB makes an announcement -> smack -> retaliation -> more smack -> bandwagons -> blobs -> smack -> FIX and Xelas accused of being lapdogs , blobbing them ensues -> smack -> BoB declares themselves winners -> Corps and Alliances disband and give themselves new names -> BoB makes a new announcment. *
Originally by: Deja Thoris
I made a perfectly decent post refuting Butterdogs that ASCN are not "soft / easy" targets.
Thanks very much for deleting it.
.. have you lost your mind..... discussing moderation on the forums is verbotten... Its quite possible that mods randomly delete posts so that the whole thread stops making sense, making it harder to pick up where we left off... 
/emote hides
|
Nez Perces
Amarr
Black Spot.
|
Posted - 2006.10.02 04:25:00 -
[15]
Edited by: Nez Perces on 02/10/2006 04:27:17
K .. here is a question for BoB, relevant to the OP.
Have you yet taken down any ASCN POS, within the Paragon Soul region?
I am quite sure that you will soon, but have you destroyed any ASCN pos in PS as of yet and set up some of your own?
|
| |
|